1952 Allard K3 vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1989 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | K3 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 57 L |
