1952 Allard K3 vs. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 535 kg more than 1952 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Allard | Mercury |
Model | K3 | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1980 mm |