1952 Allard K3 vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo
To start off, 1996 Fiat Armadillo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Armadillo (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Armadillo should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Armadillo weights approximately 194 kg more than 1952 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. 1996 Fiat Armadillo has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Fiat Armadillo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 1996 Fiat Armadillo | |
| Make | Allard | Fiat |
| Model | K3 | Armadillo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1374 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 1850 mm |
