1952 Allard K3 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Allard | MCC |
| Model | K3 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
