1952 Allard K3 vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2001 Nissan MM is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 655 kg more than 1952 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard K3. (218 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard K3. 2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Allard | Nissan |
| Model | K3 | MM |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 106 L |
