1952 Allard K3 vs. 2003 Proton 400

To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications: