1952 Allard K3 vs. 2003 Proton Impian

To start off, 2003 Proton Impian is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Proton Impian (101 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Proton Impian should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Proton Impian weights approximately 25 kg more than 1952 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton Impian, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton Impian. (140 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton Impian. 2003 Proton Impian has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Proton Impian will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: