1952 Allard K3 vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | K3 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 1307 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 61 L |