1952 Allard K3 vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Allard | Nissan |
| Model | K3 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |
