1952 Allard K3 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 655 kg more than 1952 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard K3. (218 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard K3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Allard | Toyota |
| Model | K3 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 87 L |
