1952 Allard K3 vs. 2005 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tazz is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2005 Toyota Tazz | |
| Make | Allard | Toyota |
| Model | K3 | Tazz |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 1295 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |
