1952 Allard K3 vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo V50 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3.
Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo V50 (245 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard K3. (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard K3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Allard | Volvo |
| Model | K3 | V50 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
