1952 Allard K3 vs. 2007 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 2007 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K3 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 59 L |