1952 Allard K3 vs. 2007 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2007 Holden Caprice is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard K3. (218 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard K3. 2007 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 2007 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | K3 | Caprice |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |