1952 Allard K3 vs. 2008 MG TF
To start off, 2008 MG TF is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG TF (114 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2008 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 2008 MG TF | |
Make | Allard | MG |
Model | K3 | TF |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |