1952 Allard K3 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K3 | Orlando |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |