1952 Allard K3 vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Allard | Dodge |
| Model | K3 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 6690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 4080 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 129 L |
