1952 Allard K3 vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Allard | Jeep |
Model | K3 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 420 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4956 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1694 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2781 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 78 L |