1952 Allard K3 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Allard | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | K3 | E |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 518 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4887 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1443 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2873 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 80 L |
