1952 Allard K3 vs. 2011 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2011 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2011 Daihatsu Sirion. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Daihatsu Sirion.
Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Daihatsu Sirion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daihatsu Sirion. (121 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2011 Daihatsu Sirion | |
| Make | Allard | Daihatsu |
| Model | K3 | Sirion |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 79.7 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
