1952 Allard K3 vs. 2011 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Doblo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2011 Fiat Doblo. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Fiat Doblo.
Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Fiat Doblo. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Fiat Doblo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2011 Fiat Doblo | |
| Make | Allard | Fiat |
| Model | K3 | Doblo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1248 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 69.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 82 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2755 mm |
