1952 Allard K3 vs. 2011 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Ford E-150 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2011 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K3 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2093 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 125 L |
