1952 Allard K3 vs. 2011 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2011 Renault Fluence is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Fluence weights approximately 45 kg more than 1952 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2011 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Allard | Renault |
| Model | K3 | Fluence |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 140 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2702 mm |
