1952 Allard K3 vs. 2012 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Land Rover LR2 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2012 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | Allard | Land Rover |
| Model | K3 | LR2 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4496 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1908 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2659 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |
