1952 Allard K3 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Make | Allard | Land Rover |
| Model | K3 | Range Rover Evoque |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4356 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1966 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1605 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2662 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |
