1952 Allard K3 vs. 2013 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2013 Subaru Outback is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 2013 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Allard | Subaru |
Model | K3 | Outback |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2740 mm |