1952 Allard K3 vs. 2013 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2013 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher.
Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Suzuki SX4 has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Suzuki SX4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | |
| Make | Allard | Suzuki |
| Model | K3 | SX4 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 63 L |
