1952 Allard Palm Beach vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Palm Beach. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Palm Beach would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Allard Palm Beach is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard Palm Beach (187 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard Palm Beach should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 229 kg more than 1952 Allard Palm Beach.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard Palm Beach (285 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1952 Allard Palm Beach will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Palm Beach | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Allard | Triumph |
| Model | Palm Beach | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
