1952 Allard Palm Beach vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Palm Beach. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Palm Beach would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Allard Palm Beach is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1952 Allard Palm Beach. (71 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Palm Beach. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 60 kg more than 1952 Allard Palm Beach. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard Palm Beach (152 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Allard Palm Beach will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Palm Beach | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | Palm Beach | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2210 mm |
