1952 Allard Palm Beach vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Palm Beach. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Palm Beach would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Allard Palm Beach is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard Palm Beach (187 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard Palm Beach should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1952 Allard Palm Beach is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Palm Beach. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Palm Beach. (285 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Palm Beach.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Palm Beach | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | Palm Beach | Cruze |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2685 mm |