1952 Allard Safari vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1952 Allard Safari is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard Safari (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard Safari should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 671 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 1951 Saab 92 | |
| Make | Allard | Saab |
| Model | Safari | 92 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2480 mm |
