1952 Allard Safari vs. 1954 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 1954 Volkswagen Beetle is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard Safari (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1954 Volkswagen Beetle. (34 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard Safari should accelerate faster than 1954 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 676 kg more than 1954 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Volkswagen Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 1954 Volkswagen Beetle | |
| Make | Allard | Volkswagen |
| Model | Safari | Beetle |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 1192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2410 mm |
