1952 Allard Safari vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1961 Cadillac 62 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 664 kg more than 1952 Allard Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | Safari | 62 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 6389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 79 L |
