1952 Allard Safari vs. 1963 Citroen DS
To start off, 1963 Citroen DS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard Safari (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard Safari should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 196 kg more than 1963 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 1963 Citroen DS | |
| Make | Allard | Citroen |
| Model | Safari | DS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 1911 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 43 L |
