1952 Allard Safari vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard Safari (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard Safari should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 366 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Allard | DKW |
| Model | Safari | Munga |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 31 L |
