1952 Allard Safari vs. 1964 Alpine A 110
To start off, 1964 Alpine A 110 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard Safari (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A 110. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard Safari should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 901 kg more than 1964 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 1964 Alpine A 110 | |
Make | Allard | Alpine |
Model | Safari | A 110 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 72 mm |
Top Speed | 137 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 38 L |