1952 Allard Safari vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1966 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 639 kg more than 1952 Allard Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | Safari | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 82 L |
