1952 Allard Safari vs. 1976 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1976 Renault Rodeo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 796 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 1976 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | Allard | Renault |
| Model | Safari | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2410 mm |
