1952 Allard Safari vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 296 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Allard | Chrysler |
| Model | Safari | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2630 mm |
