1952 Allard Safari vs. 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser (97 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari.
Because 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser (226 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 1986 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Allard | Toyota |
Model | Safari | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 3431 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 105 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |