1952 Allard Safari vs. 1995 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1995 Mercury Villager is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Villager weights approximately 324 kg more than 1952 Allard Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 1995 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Allard | Mercury |
| Model | Safari | Villager |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2860 mm |
