1952 Allard Safari vs. 1997 Audi A4
To start off, 1997 Audi A4 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 111 kg more than 1997 Audi A4.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Audi A4 has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard Safari has manual transmission. 1952 Allard Safari will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Audi A4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 1997 Audi A4 | |
Make | Allard | Audi |
Model | Safari | A4 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 62 L |