1952 Allard Safari vs. 2003 Jeep Liberty
To start off, 2003 Jeep Liberty is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Liberty (151 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari.
Because 2003 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 2003 Jeep Liberty | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | Safari | Liberty |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 88 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2660 mm |
