1952 Allard Safari vs. 2004 Audi A4
To start off, 2004 Audi A4 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A4 (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A4 weights approximately 14 kg more than 1952 Allard Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A4 (225 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 2004 Audi A4 | |
Make | Allard | Audi |
Model | Safari | A4 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 70 L |