1952 Allard Safari vs. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard Safari weights approximately 20 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Colorado.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (252 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | Safari | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 2770 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 252 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 102 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 74 L |
