1952 Allard Safari vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 288 kg more than 1952 Allard Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Allard | Jeep |
Model | Safari | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 78 L |