1952 Allard Safari vs. 2004 Jeep Liberty
To start off, 2004 Jeep Liberty is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,685 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Liberty (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Liberty weights approximately 179 kg more than 1952 Allard Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Liberty (319 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 2004 Jeep Liberty | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | Safari | Liberty |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 3685 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1655 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 74 L |
