1952 Allard Safari vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2004 Nissan Frontier is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (210 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 355 kg more than 1952 Allard Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (334 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard Safari | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Allard | Nissan |
| Model | Safari | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 3278 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 334 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 91.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1831 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 73 L |
