1952 Allard Safari vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9000 (165 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 189 kg more than 1952 Allard Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (280 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard Safari. (203 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard Safari.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Allard | Saab |
Model | Safari | 9000 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1665 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 61 L |