1952 Allard Safari vs. 2006 Holden Barina
To start off, 2006 Holden Barina is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard Safari (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Barina. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1952 Allard Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard Safari | 2006 Holden Barina | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | Safari | Barina |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3621 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |